Second SAARC Summit, Banglore
DECLARATION
The Bangalore Declaration of the Heads of State or Government of
the member countries of the South Asian Association for Regional
Cooperation issued on November 17, 1986.
Introduction
-
The President of Bangladesh, the King of
Bhutan, the Prime Minister of India, the President of Maldives,
the King of Nepal, the Prime Minister of Pakistan and the President
of Sri Lanka assembled at the second SAARC Summit in Bangalore
on 16 and 17 November, 1986.
-
The Heads of State or Government reiterated
their desire of promoting peace, stability, amity and progress
in the region through strict adherence to the principles of
the United Nations Charter and Non-alignment, particularly respect
for the principles of sovereign equality, territorial integrity,
national independence, non-use of force and non-interference
in the internal affairs of other States and peaceful settlement
of disputes.
-
The Heads of State or Government reaffirmed
the will of their peoples and Governments to work together in
accordance with the SAARC Charter to devise common policies
and approaches for finding common solutions to the shared problems
that all of them face. They stressed that mutual trust, goodwill
and understanding must animate their cooperative effort under
SAARC. Progress and prosperity in each country would redound
to the benefit of others. This was what constituted the SAARC
spirit.
-
The leaders reaffirmed that the principal
goal of SAARC was to promote the welfare of the peoples of South
Asia, to improve their quality of life, to accelerate economic
growth, social programmes and cultural development in the region
and to provide all individuals the opportunity to live in dignity
and to realize their full potential.
-
The Heads of State or Government recalled
that the countries of South Asia had been linked by age-old
cultural, social and historical traditions. These had led to
enriching interaction of ideas, values, culture and philosophies.
These commonalities constituted solid foundations for regional
cooperation for addressing more effectively the economic and
social problems.
-
The Heads of State or Government recalled
that the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation was
the most populous regional grouping in the world. The countries
of the region had large, rich and varied human and natural resources.
They expressed their determination to achieve the optimum utilization
of these resources by intensifying their cooperation, bearing
in mind the immense present and potential complementarities
among their economies. They recognised that this would require
increasing exchange among their countries, on the basis of mutual
benefit, of ideas, experience and technology as well as goods
and services, which utilize and enhance the productive capacity
of each of their countries and build their collective self reliance.
They were convinced that the countries of South Asia which had
been the cradle of human civilization and culture could, acting
together co-operatively and cohesively, once again play their
due role in the comity of nations.
-
The Heads of State or Government reiterated
the great importance of the increasing involvement of the people
for ensuring the success of regional co-operation. They emphasized
the need for promoting greater contacts among the peoples of
the region through such action as regular and frequent interchange
of scholars, academics, artists, authors, professionals and
businessmen as well as facilitation of tourism.
-
The Heads of State or Government noted with
satisfaction that considerable progress had been achieved in
the implementation of SAARC Integrated Programme of Action.
They expressed their firm commitment to consolidate and streamline
further the implementation of the IPA. They agreed that a progressive
movement towards more concrete and action-oriented projects
and programmes was essential to ensure more tangible benefits
from SAARC to the peoples of the region. The Heads of State
or Government emphasized the importance of expanding cooperative
endeavours under SAARC. They welcomed the establishment of the
Technical Committees on Women in Development, and on the Prevention
of Drug Trafficking and Drug Abuse.
-
The Heads of State or Government welcomed
the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding on the establishment
of the SAARC Secretariat by the Council of Ministers and their
decision to locate the Secretariat in Kathmandu and appoint
Ambassador Abul Ahsan of Bangladesh as the first Secretary-General
of SAARC. They were convinced that the establishment of the
Secretariat would assist in the coordination of SAARC activities
and more fruitful implementation of its programmes and projects.
-
The Heads of State or Government recognised
that meeting the needs of all children was the principal means
of human resources development. Children should, therefore,
be given the highest priority in national development planning.
The Heads of State or Government underlined the importance of
enhancing public consciousness and building a national political
consensus on the rights of the children. In this context they
called for an early conclusion and adoption of the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child. They subscribed to the goals of
universal immunization by 1990, universal primary education,
maternal and child nutrition, provision of safe drinking water
and adequate shelter before 2000 A. D. They also believed that
it should be possible to ensure at the end of the century, that
no child need die or be denied development, for reasons of material
poverty in the family. They directed the Standing Committee
to undertake annual reviews of the situation of children in
the SAARC countries, monitoring of programmes and exchange of
experience.
-
The Heads of State or Government agreed
that co-operation among SAARC States was vital if terrorism
was to be prevented and eliminated from the region. They unequivocally
condemned all acts, methods and practices of terrorism as criminal
and deplored their impact on life and property, social economic
development, political stability, regional and international
peace and co-operation. They recognized the importance of the
principles laid down in UN Resolution 2625 which among others
required that each State should refrain from organizing, instigating,
assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist
acts in another State or acquiesing in organized activities
within its territory directed towards the commission of such
acts.
-
The Heads of State or Government expressed
their concern at the crisis facing the United Nations system.
They reiterated their deep commitment to the purposes and principles
of the United Nations Charter and their support for and faith
in the United Nations as the most important international forum
for addressing issues of peace, disarmament and development
and an essential instrument for bringing about justice and equity
in international political and economic relations. They resolved
to concert their efforts in all multilateral fora within the
United Nations system to preserve and strengthen the Organisation
and to prevent erosion of its role, functions and principles.
-
The Heads of State or Government reiterated
their deep commitment to the principles and objectives of the
Non-aligned Movement and underlined the historic role the Movement
had been playing in strengthening international peace, promoting
development, establishing equitable and just economic relations
and strengthening international co-operation in all fields.
The success of the Harare Summit of the Non-aligned countries
was yet another demonstration of the strength and unity of the
Movement and the increasing respect that it had come to command
in the international community. They affirmed full support for
the decisions adopted at the Summit and called for their early
implementation.
-
The leaders of the South Asian countries
were convinced that an environment of peace, security and respect
for international law was essential for their growth and stability.
Unfortunately, this environment had become increasingly adverse
for the pursuit of their cherished goals. The international
political scene was marred by strife and tension due to Great
Power policies and practices of domination and intervention
as well as the increased resort to the treat or use of force,
aggression, occupation, pressure, economic coercion and interference
in flagrant violation of the principles and purposes of the
Charter of the United Nations. The arms race, particularly the
nuclear arms race, had escalated to a point where it jeopardizes
the most fundamental of all human rights - the right to live.
- The Heads of State or Government noted with deep disappointment
that the promise held out by the Reykjavik Summit could not be
realized. They, however, noted with satisfaction that the proposals
made at the Summit were still on the table. They expressed the
earnest hope that the negotiations would be resumed without delay
so that a decisive step could be taken towards realizing the ultimate
goal of eliminating nuclear weapons altogether. The Heads of State
or government called for the early conclusion of a Comprehensive
Test Ban Treaty.
- The Heads of State or Government were deeply concerned that
the world economy continued to be in the throes of crisis, with
particularly harsh and severe consequences for the economies and
development prospects and aspirations of the developing countries.
They endorsed the Declaration of the SAARC Ministerial Meeting
on International Economic Issues held in Islamabad and its analysis
of the exceptionally adverse external economic environment which
retards the development of the South Asian and other developing
countries. These negative factors include depressed commodity
prices, rising protectionism, global recession, lower export earnings,
net outflow of financial resources from developing countries and
an aggravated debt crisis.
- The Heads of State or Government noted that the rates of growth
in the developed countries had turned out to be much lower than
what was earlier projected and that the projection for future
growth in these countries was not at all encouraging. They expressed
their concern at the implications of these trends for the development
prospects of the developing countries. They welcomed the recent
recognition by the developed countries that the chronic problems
of massive payment imbalances, high interest rates, unstable exchange
rates and high unemployment are structural in nature. In view
of global interdependence, the co-ordination of macro-economic
policies, contemplated at the Tokyo Summit of the seven major
industrialized countries, cannot be effective in achieving sustained
global economic growth unless it encompasses the developing countries.
- The leaders urged that the recent retreat from multilateralism
should be urgently reversed through a revival of the North-South
dialogue which is responsive to the changed circumstances in the
world economy. This must include a process of reform of monetary
and financial system, through an International Conference on Money
and Finance for Development, and urgent measures for preserving
and strengthening the multilateral trading system. In the search
for revival of global growth, priority must be accorded to exploiting
the vast potential for expanded production, consumption and trade
which exists in the developing countries. In all these endeavours,
high priority should be accorded to supporting the development
of the least developed countries, in particular, through the full
and effective implementation of the Substantial New Programme
of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the 1980s.
- The Heads of State or Government noted with satisfaction that
at the SAARC Ministerial Meeting on International Economic Issues
a number of priority objectives of the SAARC countries have been
identified. These include: enlarged concessional assistance, the
doubling in three years of the financial flows for the development
of developing countries, amelioration of official debts, trade
liberalization, especially in textiles and agriculture, commodity
price stabilization, transfer of technology and special treatment
for least developed SAARC countries. The Heads of State or Government
agreed that the SAARC members should closely and regularly consult
and co-operate in relevant international economic conferences
and institutions in order to promote the above mentioned objectives.
They recognised that an important opportunity in this context
would be provided by UNCTAD VII.
- The Heads of State or Government were of the view that the forthcoming
New Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations posed a challenge
for their countries as well as an opportunity to accelerate their
development through the expansion of their exports. They underlined
the importance of the effective implementation with immediate
effect and continuance until the formal completion of the negotiations,
of the commitment to observe a standstill on protectionist measures
and to roll these back under multilateral surveillance. They also
expected that the principles of transparency and differential
and more favourable treatment for the developing countries would
be applied systematically and in concrete terms in the negotiations.
They decided to concert their positions in these negotiations
with a view to deriving maximum benefits from them in accordance
with their national objectives and priorities.
- The Heads of State or Government expressed their conviction
that the Bangalore Summit had helped in consolidating the gains
of regional co-operation activities so far undertaken by SAARC
while, at the same time, exploring new avenues and possibilities
for such co-operation. The Bangalore Summit had made a significant
contribution to strengthening and streamlining the institutional
basis for such co-operation.
- The Heads of State or Government reiterated their determination
and will to expand and strengthen their co-operation under SAARC.
They underlined their belief that SAARC reflected a resurgence
of the South Asian consciousness which had inspired the peoples
of this region over several millenia. The leaders expressed their
deep conviction that South Asian regional co-operation would not
only have a salutary effect on bilateral relations between the
countries of the region, but also impart strength and stability
to these relations.
- The Heads of State or Government of Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives,
Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka were deeply appreciative of the
exemplary manner in which the Prime Minister of India discharged
his responsibilities as Chairman of the Meeting. They expressed
their profound gratitude for the warm and gracious hospitality
extended to them by the Government and people of India and for
the excellent arrangements made for the Meeting.
Joint Press Release
Joint Press Release Issued an November 17, 1986 at the End of the
Second SAARC Summit, Bangalore.
1.The President of Bangladesh, the King of Bhutan,
the Prime Minister of India, the President of Maldives, the King
of Nepal, the Prime Minister of Pakistan and the President of Sri
Lanka met in Bangalore on 16 and 17 November, 1986.
2. They issued the Bangalore Declaration. A Memorandum of Understanding
on the Establishment of the SAARC Secretariat was signed by the
Foreign Ministers of the SAARC countries in their presence.
3. They welcomed the announcement by His Majesty's Government of
Nepal that the Secretariat would be inaugurated in Kathmandu on
16 January, 1987. They decided that the first Secretary-General
of the SAARC Secretariat, His Excellency Mr. Abul Ahsan, would assume
charge of this office from that date.
4. They also considered several new ideas for expanding and strengthening
the co-operative programmes under SAARC. While approving the following
ideas in principle they directed that these be elaborated and concretized
through expert level examination to be completed by March 1987,
so that the reports there on could be considered at the next Meeting
of the Council of Ministers :
(a) A South Asian Broadcasting Programme covering both radio and
television should be launched.
(b) In keeping with the emphasis that the Heads of State or Government
have laid on people-to-people contacts concrete steps should be
taken to facilitate tourism in the region, including facilities
for limited convertibility of national currencies for tourists from
SAARC countries.
(c) The Heads of State or Government emphasized the importance
they attach to students, scholars and researchers in their countries
having ready access to reliable and up-to-date information on technical,
scientific and developmental matters. This need could be best met
by a SAARC Documentation Centre as the repository of such information.
(d) The Heads of State or Government considered that it was essential
to promote increasing cross-fertilization of ideas through greater
interaction among students, scholars and academics in the SAARC
countries. They, therefore, directed that a concerted programme
of exchange of scholars be formulated and action taken for an early
institution of SAARC scholarships, SAARC Fellowships and SAARC Chairs.
(e) The Heads of State or Government stressed that the idealism
of youth must be harnessed for regional co-operative programmes.
Nothing would be more conducive to the resurgence of South Asian
consciousness than the involvement of the youth of each country
with the development programmes of the other. An Organized Volunteers
Programme should be established in SAARC under which volunteers
from one country would be able to work in other countries in the
fields of agriculture and forestry extension work.
5. The Heads of State or Government recalled that the planners
of the SAARC countries had met in 1983. This had provided a useful
opportunity for an exchange of ideas and experience in the formulation
of development strategies and methods of plan implementation. They
directed that another meeting of the planners of the SAARC member
countries be convened at the earliest.
6. The Heads of State or Government took note of the recommendations
of the Standing Committee on the financing of the institutional
costs of regional institutions. They decided that for regional institutions
where all the Member States are directly involved and benefit, the
formula proposed by the Standing Committee should be used. However,
in the case of projects which affect only a certain number of Member
States, the formula should be used as an indicative one, which could
be suitably modified on the basis of consultations among the Member
States.
7. The Heads of State or Government also decided that the next
Meeting of the Council of Ministers would be held in India in May
1987. They directed that this Meeting should undertake a detailed
review of the proposals for the establishment of regional institutions.
The member countries which have undertaken to prepare concept papers,
pre-feasibility or feasibility studies on these proposals, should
complete them well before the convening of the Meeting. The SAARC
Secretariat should establish and submit to the Ministers, an order
of priority among these proposals having regard to their costs,
benefits, readiness for implementation, and other relevant factors.
8. The Heads of State or Government gratefully accepted the offer
of the King of Nepal to host the Third SAARC Summit in 1987.
9. They also accepted with gratitude the offer of the President
of Sri Lanka to host the Fourth SAARC Summit in Sri Lanka in 1988.
|